Within Yukon
When Does a Yukon UFO Become Identifiable?
The Tagish Lake meteorite and the 1996 re-entry show how dramatic northern lights can be identified through physical and orbital evidence.
On this page
- The Tagish Lake fireball and recovered meteorite
- How re entries create formations of lights
- Why independent records change a case
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Some of Yukon’s most dramatic “UFO” reports became identifiable only after eyewitness testimony was compared with evidence outside the witnesses’ control. The Tagish Lake fireball of 18 January 2000 was linked to a natural meteoroid through photographs, seismic and infrasound recordings, satellite detections, trajectory calculations and recovered fragments. The widely reported lights of 11 December 1996 were later matched to the atmospheric re-entry of a Russian rocket stage through orbital records and reconstructed sightlines.
These cases matter because neither explanation depends on dismissing witnesses as dishonest or foolish. Both events really were extraordinary sights. The crucial change came when reports of colour, direction, duration and apparent formation were tested against measurable records. Tagish Lake shows what a strongly confirmed natural identification looks like. The 1996 case shows how an artificial re-entry can produce a seemingly structured procession of lights and even the impression of a vast solid craft.
The Tagish Lake fireball and recovered meteorite
At about 8.43 am local time on 18 January 2000, a brilliant fireball crossed the sky over southern Yukon and north-western British Columbia. It was seen from communities including Whitehorse and from a much wider region extending into Alaska. Witnesses described an intense, multicoloured light, a lingering trail and delayed booms. The event was bright enough to transform the winter morning sky and powerful enough for its atmospheric shock waves to be detected by instruments on the ground.[harvard.edu]adsabs.harvard.edua) The approximate observed ground track of fireball across Yukon, its airburst at 32 km altitude above northwest British Columbia…
A sight that bright could easily have entered UFO folklore had the evidence stopped at witness recollection. Instead, the event left several independent kinds of trace. Researchers used more than 90 eyewitness accounts, photographs of the persistent trail, recordings from seismic stations, distant infrasound sensors and a United States defence satellite. These datasets allowed the path, fragmentation and energy of the incoming object to be modelled rather than inferred from appearance alone.[wiley.com]onlinelibrary.wiley.com2002), An entry model for the Tagish Lake fireball using seismic, satellite and infrasound records…
The object was a meteoroid: a small natural body entering Earth’s atmosphere at very high speed. As atmospheric pressure and heating broke it apart, it became a fireball, or exceptionally bright meteor. Researchers estimated a pre-atmospheric mass of roughly 200,000 kilograms, although much of that material was destroyed or reduced to dust during entry. The main luminous phase ended in a high-altitude airburst near the Yukon–British Columbia border region.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThe preatmospheric mass of the Tagish Lake meteoroid was about 200,000 kilogramsThe fall, recovery, orbit, and composition of the Tagish Lake meteorite: a new type of carbonaceous chondrite - PubMedOctober 13, 2…
The decisive evidence appeared on the frozen Taku Arm of Tagish Lake in British Columbia. Local resident Jim Brook found dark fragments on the ice eight days after the fireball and collected some before fresh snow covered the area. His early samples had remained frozen and were handled with unusual care, limiting exposure to liquid water, soil and other sources of contamination. A later scientific expedition mapped a debris field about 16 kilometres long and three kilometres wide and recovered material from hundreds of locations.[uwo.ca]aquarid.physics.uwo.caOpen source on uwo.ca.
Laboratory examination identified the fragments as an extremely primitive, carbon-rich meteorite unlike the common stony meteorites found in many collections. The Tagish Lake material contains minerals and organic compounds formed early in Solar System history. Its scientific importance therefore extends far beyond identifying the fireball: the fall supplied unusually fresh material for studying the chemical environment from which planets and smaller bodies developed.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThe preatmospheric mass of the Tagish Lake meteoroid was about 200,000 kilogramsThe fall, recovery, orbit, and composition of the Tagish Lake meteorite: a new type of carbonaceous chondrite - PubMedOctober 13, 2…
The geography can cause confusion. The fireball was conspicuous over Yukon, and Yukon observations helped define its track, but the recovered pieces fell mainly on Tagish Lake in north-western British Columbia. It is properly part of Yukon’s sky history because Yukon witnesses and records were central to reconstructing the event, not because the principal recovery area lay within the territory.
Why Tagish Lake is an unusually strong identification
The Tagish Lake conclusion rests on convergence rather than one supposedly authoritative observation. Witnesses helped establish where the fireball appeared and how it travelled. Photographs preserved the position of its trail. Seismic and infrasound stations recorded the atmospheric shock. A satellite measured its light output. The debris field matched the calculated direction of flight, and physical fragments could then be analysed in laboratories.[Wiley Online Library]onlinelibrary.wiley.com2002), An entry model for the Tagish Lake fireball using seismic, satellite and infrasound records…
Each source compensated for weaknesses in the others. A person may misjudge distance, but a trail photographed against known landmarks can constrain direction. A photograph may not reveal the object’s composition, but recovered material can. A sonic boom may be reported inaccurately, but timed instrumental recordings can show when shock waves reached particular stations. The identification became reliable because the separate records described the same event.
This also explains why unusual sensory details do not make a case inexplicable. Some witnesses reported sounds, odours or sensations associated with the fireball. Such testimony is worth recording, but it is less diagnostic than the trajectory and physical recovery. Dramatic details can be sincere without being precise guides to an object’s identity.
How re-entries create formations of lights
The Yukon lights of 11 December 1996 looked very different from a brief meteor. Witnesses near Fox Lake, Carmacks, Pelly Crossing and Mayo reported rows or clusters of lights moving across the sky. Some interpreted the lights as lamps fixed to the edges of a huge, dark structure. Because reports came from several locations, the incident acquired a reputation as one of Canada’s strongest mass UFO sightings. The federal Sky Canada Project’s review notes that at least 31 people in four Yukon areas reported the display.[science.gc.ca]science.gc.caManagement of Public Reporting of Unidentified AerialManagement of Public Reporting of Unidentified Aerial
The event remained celebrated as a “giant Yukon UFO” for years, partly because no ordinary aircraft seemed capable of matching the reported scale. That framing changed in 2012, when Canadian satellite observer Ted Molczan compared the reported times and viewing directions with orbital data for objects decaying from orbit.
Molczan identified object 1996-069B, catalogue number 24671: the second stage of the rocket that had launched the Russian satellite Cosmos 2335 earlier that day. Its re-entry occurred at approximately 04:27 UTC on 12 December, corresponding to the evening of 11 December in Yukon. The object was also observed from Alaska, as would be expected for a high-altitude event visible across a broad region.[SatObs]satobs.orgOpen source on satobs.org.
A subsequent orbital reconstruction by Harro Zimmer calculated the rocket stage’s position relative to several witness locations. For a key Fox Lake report timed at about 8.30 pm, the predicted re-entry appeared low in the same general part of the sky and at almost the same time. Molczan described the temporal and positional agreement as excellent.[SatObs]satobs.orgOpen source on satobs.org.
A large re-entering object does not always resemble a single falling point. As a rocket body descends into denser atmosphere, heating and aerodynamic forces can break it into multiple pieces. The fragments remain on related paths and may glow for many seconds or even several minutes during a shallow entry. To observers below, they can appear as a procession of lights maintaining a formation.
That mechanism accounts for several otherwise puzzling features of the Yukon reports:
- Numerous lights: different fragments can brighten independently as they heat, tumble or split.
- A broad viewing area: fragments tens of kilometres high can be visible from communities separated by large distances.
- Apparent slow movement: a distant object travelling mostly across the observer’s line of sight can seem much slower than its true orbital speed.
- Silence: sound from a high-altitude breakup may arrive much later, be too weak to notice or never reach a particular observer clearly.
- An apparent dark body: the visual system may connect neighbouring lights and interpret the unlit space between them as a single solid object.
The last point is especially important. Darkness between lights is not physical evidence of a dark hull. Once observers assume that several lights belong to one nearby object, its estimated size can become enormous. A fragment train hundreds of kilometres away may then be perceived as a craft only a few kilometres away. Because the true distance is unknown, estimates such as “several football pitches” or “kilometres long” cannot be checked from testimony alone.
Why the two events looked so different
The Tagish Lake fireball and the 1996 rocket re-entry both involved material undergoing destructive atmospheric entry, but they produced different visual impressions because their speeds, structures, paths and fragmentation histories differed.
A natural meteoroid generally enters the atmosphere at interplanetary velocity. The Tagish Lake body produced an intense fireball, major fragmentation, a persistent trail and powerful shock waves over a relatively short interval. Its passage was energetic enough to be recorded by several kinds of geophysical instrument.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThe preatmospheric mass of the Tagish Lake meteoroid was about 200,000 kilogramsThe fall, recovery, orbit, and composition of the Tagish Lake meteorite: a new type of carbonaceous chondrite - PubMedOctober 13, 2…
An orbiting rocket stage begins much closer to Earth and at a lower speed than an incoming asteroid, although it is still moving at several kilometres per second. Its path may be shallow, extending the visible breakup across a long arc. Its construction also encourages it to separate into tanks, panels and other components, creating multiple lights rather than one compact luminous body.
The visual distinction is therefore not simply “meteor equals one streak” and “re-entry equals many lights”. Natural fireballs can fragment into several pieces, while artificial debris may sometimes appear nearly point-like. Identification depends on the full pattern: timing, direction, speed, duration, altitude, known orbital objects, instrument detections and whether meteorites or manufactured fragments are recovered.
Why independent records change a case
Eyewitness accounts remain essential in both Yukon examples. Without rapid reports, photographs of the Tagish Lake trail might not have been collected and the likely fall area might not have been recognised. Without statements from communities along the Klondike Highway, there would have been no detailed 1996 event to compare with orbital calculations.
The reports nevertheless become more useful when they are treated as observations to test rather than conclusions to accept. A witness may accurately report five lights moving northwards at a particular time while being mistaken about whether those lights were attached to a craft. Separating description from interpretation preserves the valuable part of the testimony.
The most useful external checks are those created independently of the UFO claim:
Precise time. A clock reading, radio log or dated photograph can distinguish between several possible astronomical or orbital events.
Viewing direction and elevation. Even approximate bearings from multiple locations can reveal whether witnesses were looking towards one high-altitude path.
Orbital records. Launch catalogues and satellite tracking data can show whether a rocket body or spacecraft was predicted to decay at the relevant time.
Instrument detections. Seismic, infrasound, satellite and radar records may establish that an energetic atmospheric event occurred even when no camera captured it directly.
Physical recovery. Meteorites or manufactured debris can settle the natural-versus-artificial question and permit laboratory analysis.
These checks also have different levels of strength. The Tagish Lake identification is exceptionally secure because the object’s atmospheric passage was reconstructed and pieces were recovered from the predicted region. The 1996 rocket-stage explanation lacks recovered debris from Yukon, but its timing, path, orbital identity and characteristic fragment formation fit the reports closely. It is therefore a strong identification, although established through orbital correlation rather than physical recovery.
What remains uncertain after identification
Explaining the source of an event does not mean every detail in every account has been reproduced. Some 1996 witnesses described changes in speed, hovering or movement towards them. Others perceived a sharply bounded object rather than a loose train of debris. Those features are difficult to reconcile literally with an uncontrolled rocket re-entry.
They do not necessarily overturn the identification. Human estimates of angular motion and distance are vulnerable when an unfamiliar light is viewed against a dark, featureless sky. A fragment that brightens may seem to accelerate towards the observer; one that fades may seem to turn away. Movement by a witness or vehicle can further alter the apparent path. Later interviews may also consolidate uncertain impressions into a more definite narrative.
A fair assessment therefore distinguishes between the shared core and the variable detail. The shared core of the 1996 reports is a large formation of lights crossing a wide area at the time and along the route of a known rocket re-entry. Claims of hovering, enormous size or deliberate response are less consistent between witnesses and are not supported by independent measurements. The common observation is strongly explained; some personal impressions remain unreconstructable.
The same caution applies to Tagish Lake. Laboratory evidence establishes that a meteoroid caused the fireball, but it cannot verify every reported smell, sound or immediate interpretation. Identification resolves the main physical event, not every moment of human perception.
When does a Yukon UFO become identifiable?
A Yukon sighting becomes identifiable when one explanation accounts for the central observations more precisely than its rivals and is supported by records not created to defend that explanation. The number of witnesses matters, but it is not decisive by itself. Many people can see the same unusual phenomenon and share the same mistaken assumption about its distance or structure.
The Tagish Lake case crossed the threshold through an unusually complete chain: widespread observation, photographed trail, instrumental detection, calculated trajectory, predicted fall zone and recovered meteorites. The 1996 case crossed it when orbital reconstruction placed a known rocket stage in the reported sky at the reported time, following a path capable of producing the observed regional sequence.
Together, they provide a practical scale for assessing other Yukon reports:
- A light with no precise time, direction, image or instrument record may remain unexplained, but it is evidentially weak.
- Several consistent accounts establish that a shared event occurred, but not necessarily what it was.
- A match with a documented aircraft, celestial object or re-entry substantially strengthens an identification.
- Independent
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to When Does a Yukon UFO Become Identifiable?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Meteorites: The Story of Our Solar System
Meteorite tells the fascinating story of the stones from outer space scattered across our planet. From the impact that finished off the d...
The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Meteorites
Beautifully illustrated with over 140 full colour images, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Meteorites provides a thorough guide to these fas...
Fire in the Sky: Comets and Meteors, the Decisive Centuries,...
Comets and meteors are spectacular and awe-inspiring natural phenomena, which are among nature's most compelling icons. Since the beginni...
Space Junk: The Dangers of Polluting Earth's Orbit
Scientists have identified at least 100 million pieces of space debris—from paint chips to nonoperational zombie satellites—floating in E...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected frommeteorite display oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2002.tb00846.x
Source snippet
(2002), An entry model for the Tagish Lake fireball using seismic, satellite and infrasound records...
2.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Title: Online Library The fall and recovery of the Tagish Lake meteorite
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2006.tb00471.x
3.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/maps.12603
4.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: Management of Public Reporting of Unidentified Aerial
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/sites/default/files/documents/report-sky-canada-project.pdf
5.
Source: satobs.org
Link:https://www.satobs.org/seesat/Apr-2012/0331.html
6.
Source: satobs.org
Link:https://www.satobs.org/decay.html
7.
Source: satobs.org
Title: Visually Observed Natural Re entries latest draft
Link:https://www.satobs.org/reentry/Visually_Observed_Natural_Re-entries_latest_draft.pdf
8.
Source: satobs.org
Link:https://www.satobs.org/seesat/May-2012/0022.html
9.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: OCS A’s Youth Council (CSA-YC)
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/office-chief-science-advisor/science-advisory-team/ocsas-youth-council-csa-yc
10.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: annual report chief science advisor 2024 2025
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/office-chief-science-advisor/annual-reports/annual-report-chief-science-advisor
11.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: Sky Canada Project
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/office-chief-science-advisor/sky-canada-project
12.
Source: science.gc.ca
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/office-chief-science-advisor/sky-canada-project/preview-sky-canada-report-ocsa
13.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: Questions and Answers about the Sky Canada Project
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/office-chief-science-advisor/sky-canada-project/questions-and-answers-about-sky-canada-project
14.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: Questions et réponses sur le projet Ciel Canada
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/fr/bureau-conseillere-scientifique-chef/projet-ciel-canada/questions-reponses-projet-ciel-canada
15.
Source: agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2023GL105773
16.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: Search all objects
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/educational-resources/history-geological-survey-canada-175-objects/search-all-objects
17.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: Protect your research
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/safeguarding-your-research/general-information-research-security/protect-your-research-regional-factsheets/yukon
18.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/maps.13362
19.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: contaminants canadas north state knowledge and regional highlights 2017
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/northern-contaminants-program/publications/canadian-arctic-contaminants-assessment-report-series/contaminants-canadas-north-state-knowledge-and-regional-highlights-2017
20.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: synopsis research conducted under 2013 2014 northern contaminants program
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/northern-contaminants-program/publications/ncp-synopses-research-report-series/synopsis-research-conducted-under-2013-2014-northern-contaminants-program
21.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: environmental monitoring and research 2017 2018
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/northern-contaminants-program/ncp-funded-projects/ncp-funded-projects-2017-2018/environmental-monitoring-and-research
22.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2016/1751730
23.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.12271
24.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Title: j.1945 5100.2006.tb00471.x
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2006.tb00471.x
25.
Source: satobs.org
Title: Visually Observed Natural Re entries DRAFT 10
Link:https://satobs.org/seesat_ref/misc/Visually_Observed_Natural_Re-entries_DRAFT_10.pdf
26.
Source: library-[archives]({{ ‘archives/’ | relative_url }}). canada.ca
Link:https://library-archives.canada.ca/eng/services/services-libraries/theses/Pages/item.aspx?idNumber=1019493048
27.
Source: science.gc.ca
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/fr/bureau-conseillere-scientifique-chef/projet-ciel-canada/gestion-signalements-publics-phenomenes-aeriens-non-identifies-canada
28.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: chief science advisor annual report 2022 23
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/office-chief-science-advisor/annual-reports/chief-science-advisor-annual-report
29.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: northern contaminants program 2026 call proposals
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/northern-contaminants-program/call-proposals-2026/northern-contaminants-program-2026-call-proposals
30.
Source: science.gc.ca
Title: working plant hospital
Link:https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/blogs/cultivating-science/working-plant-hospital
31.
Source: adsabs.harvard.edu
Link:https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/2006M%26PS…41..407H
Source snippet
a) The approximate observed ground track of fireball across Yukon, its airburst at 32 km altitude above northwest British Columbia...
32.
Source: aquarid.physics.uwo.ca
Link:https://aquarid.physics.uwo.ca/~pbrown/Videos/recovery_article.htm
Source snippet
on January 18, 2000. Residents in the Yukon Territory and British Columbia, as...Read more...
Published: January 18, 2000
33.
Source: cir.nii.ac.jp
Link:https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1362262944463029120
34.
Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.12271
Source snippet
Testing variations within the Tagish Lake meteorite—I: Mineralogy and petrology of pristine samples - Blinova - 2014 - Meteoritics & P...
35.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Title: The preatmospheric mass of the Tagish Lake meteoroid was about 200,000 kilograms
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11030647/
Source snippet
The fall, recovery, orbit, and composition of the Tagish Lake meteorite: a new type of carbonaceous chondrite - PubMedOctober 13, 2...
36.
Source: aquarid.physics.uwo.ca
Link:https://aquarid.physics.uwo.ca/research/fireball/events/tagish/recovery_article.html
37.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Title: Pub Med The organic content of the Tagish Lake meteorite
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11520948/
38.
Source: aquarid.physics.uwo.ca
Title: ca Meteor Physics
Link:https://aquarid.physics.uwo.ca/research/fireball/events/tagish/sat_detection.html
39.
Source: aquarid.physics.uwo.ca
Title: ca Tagish Lake Meteorite — Peter Brown
Link:https://aquarid.physics.uwo.ca/~pbrown/tagish/
40.
Source: researchgate.net
Title: Tagish Lake | Request PDFView Show
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249503215_Tagish_Lake
41.
Source: taitlab.com
Link:https://www.taitlab.com/collections
42.
Source: psrd.hawaii.edu
Title: Tagish Lake
Link:https://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Dec02/TagishLake.html
43.
Source: profils-profiles.science.gc.ca
Link:https://profils-profiles.science.gc.ca/en/profile/dr-nathan-hayward-dphil
44.
Source: profils-profiles.science.gc.ca
Title: dr stephen wolfe
Link:https://profils-profiles.science.gc.ca/fr/profil/dr-stephen-wolfe
45.
Source: profils-profiles.science.gc.ca
Link:https://profils-profiles.science.gc.ca/en/profile/mike-bradford?wbdisable=false
46.
Source: profils-profiles.science.gc.ca
Link:https://profils-profiles.science.gc.ca/fr/installations?page=11
47.
Source: meteorites.asu.edu
Title: tagish lake
Link:https://meteorites.asu.edu/meteorites/tagish-lake
Additional References
48.
Source: astrobiology.nasa.gov
Title: the tagish lake meteorite
Link:https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/news/the-tagish-lake-meteorite/
Source snippet
NASA AstrobiologyThe Tagish Lake Meteorite: | News28 Jan 2002 — The rare Tagish Lake fireball left an orange-white and blue contrail that...
49.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Brilliant fireball over California may have been re-entry of Chinese space junk
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7S_DpOmDeQ
Source snippet
Tagish Lake meteorite Yukon fireball Iconic: Tagish Lake Meteorite Royal Ontario Museum...
50.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Fireball above Las Vegas before alien 911 call was meteor, scientist says
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCvNVmTiIQQ
Source snippet
Brilliant fireball over California may have been re-entry of Chinese space junk...
51.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Canadian Meteorite Could Hold Clue To The Origins Of Life
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ANBqYqyez4
Source snippet
Fireball above Las Vegas before alien 911 call was meteor, scientist says...
52.
Source: sandia.gov
Link:https://www.sandia.gov/labnews/2026/06/18/how-scientists-support-planetary-defense-by-reconstructing-a-fireballs-path-using-sound-waves/
53.
Source: pnnl.gov
Link:https://www.pnnl.gov/publications/fall-recovery-orbit-and-composition-tagish-lake-meteorite-new-type-carbonaceous
54.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237169670_Canadian_meteorites_A_brief_review
55.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235240616_The_Fall_Recovery_Orbit_and_Composition_of_the_Tagish_Lake_Meteorite_A_New_Type_of_Carbonaceous_Chondrite
56.
Source: mendeley.com
Link:https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5e7dc974-6870-3d74-9f74-94e7e237beb3/
57.
Source: dokumen.pub
Link:https://dokumen.pub/asteroids-how-love-fear-and-greed-will-determine-our-future-in-space-9780300258387.html